Contents

Content

Chapter 1

Old dogmas. Trotsky’s foreign body

Only social democracy has remained of the left movement in the modern world.

It has shown vitality only in Europe and only thanks to democratic habits. In the democratic ark, there should be “a pair from each species.”

There are also no prospects for the so-called leftists in other parts of the world. If you want social guarantees, go to the polling station.

One after another, the countries of South America stumble upon the electoral rake. There seem to be no more precedents, such as until the overthrow of Allende by the junta. But the victories of left-wing coalitions still happen as it was during Allende. The world has changed. It became tolerant because maybe the USA became tolerant. Coups have also disappeared from world practice. Or rather, the danger has disappeared because the second camp and the second world subject, the USSR, have disappeared. Now it has become easier to turn people over and give injections. Who can prohibit, for example, vaccination?

We state that the left does not have any other way to achieve power today. However, there are no leftists in the world either in the sense of the leftism of the 20th century. Once again, the world has changed. From the left, there are now only talkers, only left-wing Pharisees. Actually, this is evidence of a global crisis. For in the tolerant world of democracy, not only individuals disappear, but also intellectuals. Democracy has always led to degradation everywhere. In the system and social networks, the crowd selects lecturers and idols for themselves. The system leaves communist artists to play communists, and on social networks, a crowd of hedonists is looking for different clowns. Therefore, bloggers want to avoid explaining, not to teach, but to gain a crowd of subscribers.

So.

Our leftists repeat the mantras of a century ago; they resemble the Pharisees of the ancient Sanhedrin of Judea. But no, the ancient Jews are no longer looking at them because the ancient Jews should talk about the Old Testament. Therefore, imitating the hoary antiquity, our left-wing lecturers automatically turned into ancient Jewish Caiaphas because reliance on old dogmas is always more reliable. This is what distinguishes the Pharisees.

The more often they repeat the old formulas of Marx and Lenin, the more they know that they are talking nonsense. We can say that they are hiding behind the old men — Marx and Lenin. But the old people, even if they were authoritative, lived in a different time, in a different environment. This is not Ancient Judea with its thousand-year history. The world has changed rapidly in a hundred years.

What to do?

We need to figure it out.

Why young people don’t want communism today. Young people want democracy and be living like in the West. Young people want equal rights. Or respect for their rights.

But should the left-wing Pharisees say, are you also waiting for the second coming? As they immediately accuse revisionism. It has already been so! Marx and the dictatorship of the proletariat! Many have tried but what happened in practice?.

What? What is the dictatorship?

There were feudal peoples in the world, which means peasant peoples.

These feudal-class peoples gave the so-called socialism in the first half of the 20th century. No matter how Trotsky defied the world system with the dictatorship of the proletariat after the time of Marx, there were no proletarian peoples in the world! Therefore, Trotskyism was always opposed by former peasants who turned into a new communist elite. Trotsky could never win (there is one condition, but it is not for this short article.). And Trotskyism could never win because the factories do not make the state. They are part of the economy of industrial modernization. They disappear as a stage of development. If there are no factories, there is no proletariat. If there is no proletariat, there is no dictatorship. If there are no activists of history, the basic subjects of action, then go to the ballot boxes! This is the simplest explanation for the crisis of the left idea.

Trotsky personally and Trotskyism have only one gratitude — for the left alternative to Stalinist-peasant communism. But, again and again. The world could not get any other socialism in the 20th century, except socialism, which grew out of a class-feudal culture — from tradition. Russia, China, Korea, Vietnam, Kampuchea are in Asia. This is the territory of a rigid collective tradition. The peoples with a similar culture of collectivism adopted the so-called communism, but new bureaucrats replaced the local feudal elites through the revolution. These are the nations where capitalism was underdeveloped. But the alienation in which the Eastern (fertile peoples) lived at that time was enormous. There could be no other communism. It’s all objective. For today, Marxists have one task or those who consider themselves such. Understand. From which follows planetary individualism. Democracy or the market system has proved that a person needs alienation. He wants to separate himself from the crowd, to put it simply. Therefore, the left has no future with the old dogmas. Young people are for democracy.

Hence, the so-called Marxists have no choice but to join the crowd of ancient “Jews” and shout crucify him! I have not met any other reaction from hypocrites, impotent, and therefore envious, except for accusations of revisionism. Well, of course! Repeating the conclusions of a century ago in a new environment is not only a habit. It’s also an excuse. The Pharisees also justified themselves by the millennial experience of the people.

Chapter 2

Russia after the formal victory of Zyuganov’s Communists

What would have changed if the Communist Party faction had taken the majority in the Duma?

Nothing. Because the second head of the fairy-tale dragon of the local bureaucracy would have risen conditionally. Actually, the Communist Party formally won. But this victory is not hers. People voted from the opposite. Democracy is different in this. Everywhere. What is not pleasant, annoying is replaced by something less unpleasant. Communist Party was the less unpleasant for people, in a conditional store, where give up-the same conditional things are sold. The Communist Party, together with its experienced leader, the compromiser, was chosen only from Russian hopelessness. The domination of the main boyars of the EP became simply unbearable. Even the main competitors of the state oligarchs on the business idea — Navalny’s people, called for voting for the Communist Party through smart voting. The enemy of my enemy is my friend. This, too, is from hopelessness. Even with their cultural modernization and market tolerance, conditional Democrats would never vote for conditional Gulag members.

Modern communists, or people who call themselves such, are no less greedy. But they have limitations because of their ideology. Each profession has its specific professional clothing, like the doctor, for example, has a white coat. The worker has a roba. The orchestra conductor has a tailcoat. Zyuganov’s communists learned to sell communist ideology professionally, although people thought less about communism in these elections. Members of the Communist Party, and many other left-wing Pharisees, are obliged to talk about the people. The people are suffering, and the people are getting poorer. But no one will leave the Duma. To live as a people? What for? The Communist Party is a profession in one word. And so, let’s imagine, the professional actors of the second plan were brought out as main artists. What would have happened? But nothing. First, the quality of the performance would drop. It’s natural. Then the supporting actors would get a little comfortable with their new role. The old mechanism or system would have been cleaned up and started working again at the same speed. What will change if you change the car’s details in the blue wrapper to the details in the red wrapper? Its replays of cargo cult. Is that clear? Hypocrites and Pharisees cannot change anything; they can only repeat.

Few people came to the symbolic protest rallies. That’s why they are symbolic. And now let’s remember how much came out for liberal Navalny throughout the Russian Federation. Thousands of times more. The electoral triumph of the Communist Party, albeit formal, is not a victory of the communist idea. Nobody needs the communist idea. These symbolic rallies are the evidence of this. Modern leftists, those who are called, or those who consider themselves Marxists prefer not to see this. Modern leftism is full of old Pharisees, middle-aged, and even there are young parrots about the dictatorship of the proletariat, about justice, about other ideas of Karl Marx from the 19th century. Modern left-wing Pharisees think in terms of a century ago and even more. (This is if the Marxists of Lenin’s time were talking about the Mazdakids and the eternal, holy methods of their struggle). The modern left does not even understand why they are in crisis. They are nervously leafing through Lenin’s hundred-year-old records. They carry gibberish. They calm their ego.

First, the modern left must admit that they are a product of tradition, that the so-called planetary communism was established on earth only thanks to, and despite, Marx. Only nations with a rigid tradition have established a new traditional system and called it communist. Russia, China, Korea, Vietnam, Kampuchea is in Asia. This is the territory of a rigid collective tradition. The peoples with a similar culture of collectivism adopted the so-called communism but in fact came new bureaucrats who replaced the local feudal elites through the revolution. These were the nations where capitalism was underdeveloped. But the alienation in which the Eastern (fertile peoples) lived at that time was enormous. Europe solved its overpopulation by World War. Then it made an upgrade. By this time, the peoples of the East were not ready for a world war. These were the peoples of the periphery. They were late for planetary modernization, so they chose a catch-up project. The communist project is a catch-up project, yes, as rigid collectivism in the tradition is compensation for the severity of the climate and conditions by common labor. The countries of the Asian tradition chose communist ideas because they approached their dictatorship (of the proletariat) to the collective memory of peoples, to the production culture of reflexes. Karl Marx, an urbanized citizen, despised feudalism, Asia, and Russia. Therefore, empirically, he could not in any way connect the alienation of the slave personality from the alienation of the proletarian personality. The alienation of the proletarian personality is the same as a member of a generic collective. The generic “nothing” alienation could not happen unnoticed in the modern Marx city. It happened just in the kind of alienation described by Marx. But Marx concluded the reasons for a person’s dependence on society. Industrial relations in a duet with production forces did not allow a person to be free. From this, Marx found a solution to replace people with machines that create abundance. But if a tribal person is freed from relatives, will he become free? If a peasant is left without a village, won’t he run wild?

Similarly, a person who is not working, freed from alienation, will not write poetry and philosophize. Abundance will not make a person kinder. But the fact that Marx jumped over the traditional alienation, did not see the old tradition in capitalist alienation, still blinds all the so-called Marxists on the left, (for me — a large crowd of Pharisees). They feel it would be better not to think at all. Alienation is changing, the city is replacing the village, but the culture and traditions remain. And production robots and other mechanisms cannot solve this problem.

That’s how Zyuganov and Co. are primarily traditional people from the village. What the system, the tradition, tells them, they will do. They received from the system all profits, and they will still receive, like that meek heifer sucking at two cows.

Chapter 3

There must be an emperor in the empire

The world of information and its consumers needs resonances. Information channels scare all the time, or write “that the world shuddered.” The world shuddered because divers found something at the bottom of the ocean. The world shuddered that a famous politician said something. And so on. But who in Russia shuddered to the wedding? For the wedding of a man from the last tsarist Russian monarchical dynasty. After all, the late Russian tsar was overthrown in 1917. There was the same resonance. Who in modern Russia was not lazy, paid attention?

The world of information and its consumers needs resonances. Information channels scare or write “the world shuddered” all the time. Therefore, in the Russian Federation, not everybody is true, but interested citizens also shuddered. Although, no one now cares about anyone or anything. These newsmakers and other creators of ideas “shuddered”. The townsfolk have been in suspended animation for a long time at the resonances. Only the primary instincts remained. It seems the modern man in the street has no other traits. Such a tendency that soon reasonable people will not be found.

A lot of time spent