A New Approach To The Analysis Of Nuclear Reactions Under The Influence Of High-Energy Particles On A Stationary Target Nucleus In The Physics Of Resonant Nuclear Reactions
UDK:53.08
Ibratjon Aliyev1, G’olibjon Qo’ldashov2, Sultonali Abdurakhmonov3, Inomjon Bilolov4 and Sharobiddin Isroilov4
1 SRI «PRNR», Electron Laboratory LLC, 151100, Margilan, Fergana region, Republic of Uzbekistan
2 National Research of «Renewable Energy Sources» under the Ministry of Energy of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 100000, Tashkent region, Tashkent, Republic of Uzbekistan
3 Fergana Polytechnic Institute, 150100, Fergana, Fergana region, Republic of Uzbekistan
4 Fergana branch of Tashkent University of Information Technologies named after Mukhammad al-Khwarizmi, 150118, Fergana, Fergana region, Republic of Uzbekistan
Abstract. The paper presents a new form of complex analysis of nuclear reactions brought to a state of resonance. This state of nuclear reactions is investigated according to the model of physics of resonant nuclear reactions. The study examines each channel of the nuclear reaction, calculates the nuclear effective cross-section of each of the channels before and after reduction. During the analysis, attention is drawn to the theoretical study of the energy characteristics of the products of each of the reaction channels, with a percentage ratio. The temperature gradients of the nuclei and targets formed at different stages of the reaction are determined. As a result, a complete model has been formed to create a complete description of the nuclear reaction being produced and analyzed, which makes it possible to theoretically predict the outcome of any nuclear reaction. The analysis concludes with the final result in the form of all parameters of the nuclear reaction products at all stages.
Keywords: nuclear reaction channels, nuclear effective cross section, probabilistic nuclear reaction channels, nuclear reaction analysis.
Introduction
The implementation of a nuclear reaction is the bombardment of a beam of charged particles — ionized nuclei, leptons, elementary particles of other categories with selected parameters of the target nuclei. To date, in order to study nuclear reactions [1—2] occurring during bombardment by high-energy charged particles of stationary target nuclei, experimental research is primarily being conducted using charged particle accelerators at different beam energies with different levels of monochromatization [3—4; 8]. In this case, the accelerator can be in the form of various designs, depending on the specified parameters.
A common case when using this method is the use of several channels of acceleration lines, where the beam is separated by a separator, often electromagnetic, into separate beams that collide with the target in different chambers [5]. Thus, to calculate the nuclear effective cross section of the reaction, it is necessary to use a special chamber with a dense insulating, more often lead shell and separate detectors. Cylindrical chamber designs are used to analyze the reaction results with the additional possibility of studying the Rutherford scattering effect [6—7].
Based on this, it is clearly seen that these reactions require a sufficient amount of time to prepare and direct the corresponding energy costs. Therefore, sufficient preparatory time, material and energy costs are required to study the interaction of beams with target nuclei in various combinations [9—10; 15]. After the experiment, the results are processed using the available theoretical analysis methodology, which is described in many research papers [11—12]. However, in order to accelerate research work in the field of nuclear reactions, a new approach is needed that outputs results when certain initial and boundary conditions change — the parameters of the accelerator, beam and target, therefore, the creation of a new approach that accelerates the obtaining of results in nuclear reactions is relevant.
A separate problem today is the complexity of studying a new type of reaction, resonant nuclear reactions. Such reactions can be carried out on accelerators with high beam monochromacy [13]. So today, on cyclotrons, synchrotrons, phasotrons, and linear accelerators, monochromaticity reaches 5 keV at a beam energy of 20 MeV [14—15; 18]. An increase in this degree is possible with rigid separation, which leads to a large loss of beam current by 70—80% [16; 19—20]. Van de Graaf accelerators with a beam monochromaticity of 1 keV at the same maximum beam energy are considered the most accurate [15—17; 21].
An increase in this degree is possible with a more accurate selection of energy using nano-electrodes and special monochromotic devices that are at the design stage [18; 22]. However, it is important to create a mathematical model beforehand that allows not only predicting the implementation of nuclear reactions, but also all their varieties, including resonant nuclear reactions with great accuracy. Based on this, the task is also relevant.
Materials and methods of research
In the course of the research, the method of solving boundary and initial conditions in the form of accelerator system parameters, the method of classification, analysis, and mathematical modeling was used.
Research
The analysis of nuclear reactions can be carried out in a variety of ways and using different algorithms; however, the purpose of the analysis remains unchanged — to create a complete picture of the analyzed nuclear reaction. In the early analysis model [1], initially one nuclear reaction was isolated, one specific channel of it was analyzed — its energy characteristic, nuclear effective cross-section, percentages and other parameters were determined, and only after the study moved to the stage of analyzing other channels of the nuclear reaction, and at the same time the initially analyzed channel remained isolated. Each time, the chosen channel in the exo-energy reactions had a large nuclear effective cross-section, which seemed inexplicable.
The problem was that the initial channel was selected more often for the energy of the Coulomb barrier, as a result, it was observed that the reaction was carried out in an area with a large percentage, which turned out to be the main channel with a large reaction yield, since the main criterion for selected nuclear reactions in early analyses relative to the previous algorithm was the efficiency in the reaction output. In the new model of reaction analysis, the solution to this problem plays a special role, presented in the following form.
Suppose that a nuclear reaction c with its own channels (1) is initially set.
Which can also be converted to (2).
Initially, the analysis assumes the determination of the radius of the target core being bombarded (3), in order to further determine the Coulomb incoming barrier (4).
After determining the Coulomb incoming barrier, which can most often be higher than the threshold of a nuclear reaction, the energy of the incoming particle is determined, and as the energy approaches, it becomes possible to increase the probability of a larger number of nuclear reactions. However, in each case, more than one nuclear reaction channel is considered (1), among which there are reaction channels that are maximally probabilistic (5).
Such channels include channels with outgoing elementary particles or relatively light nuclei, among which one can single out a proton as the nucleus of a hydrogen atom, a deuteron and a triton as the nuclei of deuterium and tritium, respectively, as well as alpha particles.
But also, together with the above-mentioned probabilistic reaction channels, it is possible to carry out reactions with the departure of lighter reactions if, compared with heavy nuclei, the departing nucleus is with sufficiently small masses, however, it is the channels with the departing particles in (5) that are most often determined. In the early analysis, the situation with energies not reaching the surface was not considered. the value up to the Coulomb barrier, however, in this case, if necessary, this moment is considered.
To study this variation, a Rutherford scattering variant is demonstrated, where the scattering angle (6) is initially determined, which determines the ratio from the cross-sectional area of the incident beam to the total area of a sphere with a radius equal to the beam radius, which makes it possible to determine in steradians the angle from which the beam is directed towards the core, demonstrating a one-sided The direction of the beam is different than in the cases of special accelerators with multiple accelerator systems, which include a system for starting a thermonuclear reaction with a large angle.
Also, at the same time, the boundary velocity of the incoming beam (7) is determined, which is calculated on the condition that the energy of the beam is exactly equal to the energy of the Coulomb barrier, as a result of which, after passing, the particle simply would not have kinetic energy left.
In addition to the factor of determining the boundary velocity, it is worth adding that the beam velocity cannot be exactly equal to the boundary velocity due to the impossibility of ensuring zero monochromatization in the accelerator, as well as due to the law of the impossibility of having zero kinetic energy in particles. After determining the necessary ratios in (6—7), they are substituted into the expression for calculating the effective cross section, which is derived in equation (8).
Along with this, in order to determine the minimum distance between the incoming beam and the core (10), an additional parameter of the electromagnetic diameter of the core (9) is calculated.
Thus, as a result of the initial part of the analysis, it was possible to determine the effective cross-section, which is measured in bars (8) and represents the probability of a barrier with the calculation of the distance at which the incoming particle approaches the nucleus without interacting with it (10). The data determined in this way is quite exhaustive to describe a situation where elastic interaction between particles is carried out without entering into a reaction. The only exceptions are thermonuclear reactions, in which, due to universal ionization and a number of other factors, the presence of the Coulomb barrier is ignored, acting according to separate private algorithms.
In this analysis, the situation with the incoming particle beams in the accelerator is considered, as a result of which the probabilities can be determined according to the previously presented patterns. After all possible channels of nuclear reactions have been identified, but most often more probabilistic in the first degree with the release of light particles, the output of such channels (11) and the thresholds of such reactions (12) are calculated.
After the reaction channel is calculated in each of the cases, the second-degree probabilistic channels of nuclear reactions can be determined. Such channels have a positive output of nuclear reactions, that is, they are exo-energetic, if any, or if all reactions are endo-energetic, then, provided that the required energy level is reached by the incoming beam to satisfy such a reaction, that is, if there is a possibility of releasing the energy that the reaction takes, the probability of the reaction it is distributed between them.
Determining the output of the reaction channels allows not only to characterize each of the channels, but also to determine the probability of what percentage of the total set of particles will be directed to implement one or another probabilistic nuclear reaction channel. This probability can be determined by (13) as a percentage, but in the future, in each of the cases, the nuclear effective cross-section of each of the nuclear reaction channels must be determined, for which the density of the target nuclei (14) is initially calculated, which is the number of target nuclei per cubic meter, which can be It is defined as the ratio of the target density to the mass of the nuclei in kilograms.
In the classical form of the analysis, the derivation of the expression was partially presented, the relationship between the initial number of incoming particles in the beam to the number of particles involved in the reaction and in which the target thickness and nuclear density (14) are involved, together with the value of the nuclear effective cross-section, which can also be derived in (15).
Thus, for each of the channels, a certain set is calculated in the form of a sequence of values of the nuclear effective cross section (16).
Each of these values is determined directly for the case when the energy of the impinging particle is directly selected for one or another channel to which the value of the nuclear effective cross-section belongs in the sequential set (16). It is worth noting that each of the values of the nuclear effective cross-section divides the line of values in bars into certain areas. So, in order to determine exactly the situation with the nuclear effective cross-section and the percentage distribution in the case of strictly defined energy values in this case, it is necessary to act according to a different algorithm, which in this system will restore order in the case when the nuclear effective cross-section in the case under consideration falls into one of the areas, which makes this area into which The value was more probabilistic in the immediate case under consideration.
Thus, in order to achieve the optimal case, the energy of the incident particle is chosen as the sum of the Coulomb incoming barrier and a certain value, which makes the beam energy equal to the value that the accelerator can achieve with its own monochromatic value (17).
Then, after determining the energy (17), the velocity of the particle (18) is calculated, which cannot be confused with the boundary values of velocity, as can be seen from the formula, after which this value is substituted into the expression of momentum (19) according to the theory of relativity with known mass values, due to sufficiently large velocity values, and after which this value is inserted into the expression definitions of the de Broglie wave (20) for an incoming particle.
After the necessary components are determined, the nuclear effective cross-section (21) can be calculated, which is an area larger than the cross-section of the nucleus and in which the incoming particle also interacts without even touching the nucleus.
Then, after that, the percentage (22) belonging to the maximum percentage value can be determined, taking into account the factor that the numerator refers to the number of particles that did not interact.
And now, to determine which channel of a nuclear reaction such a reaction belongs to, the effective cross-section calculated in (21) is substituted into a certain area, into which the area of nuclear effective cross-sections was previously divided, and the implemented channel with the calculated percentage ratio (22) is the channel defined by the pattern (23).
Thus, a set with positive nuclear effective cross-sections can be found by applying a special operator (23) for such a general set, according to regularity (22), resulting in the most probable values of the nuclear effective cross-section.
However, in this case, when the percentage ratio for the main reaction channel is determined, the remaining percentages are determined according to the ratios of the outputs of their channels. So, if the percentage ratio and the nuclear effective cross-section coincided with the first reaction channel, then the percentages of the following channels are determined, from where it is easy to calculate their nuclear effective cross-sections (25).
In addition, the percentage ratio with the changes made is sufficient to represent new separating percentages with new values of the additional nuclear effective cross-sections of each of the channels, for the case under direct investigation, showing probabilistic reactions with their nuclear effective cross-sections (26).
Thus, part of the analysis of the reaction initiation case is completed and after that it is necessary to pay attention to the further development of the reaction. So, after the reaction, most often, even among the probable channels, radioactive nuclei may be present, which must also be analyzed as decaying, in the form of their own long channels (27), most often with light escaping nuclei, as was done in (5).
For each of the channels, the reaction output (28) is determined, which, due to the index, should not be mixed with (11), from where a new system of probabilistic nuclear reaction channels (29) is compiled using the same algorithm to determine the positive values of the outputs for each of the reaction channels.
Most often, during this stage of analysis, only those channels remain, as a result of which stable nuclei and stable outgoing light particles or light nuclei remain, each of which will be produced. And to determine the percentage ratio, (13) is used for the present case, as a result of which it is possible to determine the percentage ratio, which will not be changed due to the absence of an incoming particle with the choice of new versions of the probability values of each of the channels of nuclear radioactive decay.
As a result of the transformations obtained and the results regarding the probabilistic channels of the nuclear reaction, according to the latest model (26) and the probabilistic channels of the reaction for the radioactive nucleus (29), the kinetic energies for the nuclei and outgoing particles in (30—37) can be calculated according to certain patterns.
After the kinetic energies for each of the nuclear reaction products have been determined, as probabilistic for the main channel and probabilistic for the decay channels of radioactive nuclei, it is necessary to present the distribution according to the currents of incoming beams and products of each of the reaction channels. To do this, it is initially assumed to determine the previously calculated beam cross-section (38), from which it is possible to deduce from the formula for the beam current the amount of incoming particles (39), which was not previously determined during the calculation of percentages and the nuclear effective cross-section for the analyzed case.
During the analysis of the reaction situation, the incoming beams have a certain amount of current, set initially and most often limited by the capabilities of the accelerator system, from where it becomes possible to determine the number of incoming particles (39) and from where it is possible to determine the total charge of the incoming beam (40).
Finally, after the percentage distributions have been made, the probable channels with their nuclear effective cross-sections, the kinetic energies of the reaction products and the number of incoming particles have been determined, it is possible to fully present a model of the distribution of incoming particles in a variety of all channels, including in a variety of probabilistic channels of radioactive decay, from where it is possible to determine according to previously determined kinetic energies reaction products, exact quantitative ratios (41).
Thus, after analyzing the quantitative ratio, it becomes obvious that the elementary particles will simply leave the resulting split core, where the droplet model of nuclear reactions is most often used. The parameters of the outgoing particles, along with their number, kinetic energies, and beam cross sections, which are partly equal to (38), are obvious.
It remains to analyze the situation with the remaining cores. One of the main indicators required for determination is the variable temperature of the formed nuclei as a result of the nuclear reaction, which can be determined from the total energy of the components, which can be represented as the products of the energies of each of the nuclei together with the number of nuclei formed, resulting in the total energy of the nuclei of each of the nuclear reaction channels (42).
Since each of the reaction channels is carried out in a certain percentage during the reaction, from this it is possible to determine the total energy as the sum of the energies of the forming nuclei (43), in cases when particles fly out of them and do not fly out, which may be useful for determining the temperature in (47), for which it is necessary to determine the quantitative ratio with the specific heat capacity of the plate to its mass, for which its volume (44) is determined, and from there the initial mass (45) is determined from the density value, However, since the plate consumed part of the nuclei to carry out the nuclear reaction, it is necessary to determine the resulting mass [46].
Thus, as a result of the reaction, the necessary particular characteristic for the nuclei has been determined, along with their number, mass, and temperature, however, we will have to return to this issue, since this is precisely the internal temperature, but it is worth paying attention to the outgoing particles now. Each of the outgoing particles in each of the reaction channels has its own total charge for each of the beams (48) with its own velocities (49) and currents (50).
Before starting the reaction, the input Coulomb barrier was determined, after which various internal indicators began. Now that each of them is known, it remains to determine the output results, which can be represented as an outgoing Coulomb barrier (52), with the radii of each of the formed nuclei (51).
It should be noted here that the outgoing Coulomb barrier, according to experimental data, almost always acts in cases when the outgoing particle has a positive charge, exactly like the nucleus and quite rarely in cases with negative charges. So, when the nucleus and the outgoing particle have the same charge, the kinetic energies add up, in the opposite cases they should reach each other, however, according to the resulting work, it is necessary to postulate that in most cases, such an addition is extremely rare for a charge of different names.
Along with the above, it is also impossible to say that there are no nuclear reactions carried out in which there would be no energy negation of the outgoing particle, which may be one of the topics of further research. However, one should not discount the possibility of an explanation using existing nuclear models, for example, a drop or shell model of the nucleus. The first described case with charges of the same name for the energies of outgoing particles with an outgoing Coulomb barrier can be defined as the sum in (53).
From the energy expression obtained, it is possible to determine the velocity of the outgoing particle (54) with their own currents (55).
Now, it only remains to return to the issue of the energies of the formed nuclei, which also have changed energies (56), from where we can calculate the value for the changed total energy (57), and therefore the temperature (58).
As a result, all the necessary results that needed to be determined were identified. Thus, we can say that the nuclear reaction (1) with all its reaction channels has been fully analyzed.
Results
As a result of the analysis, the following conclusions are drawn:
1. The condition of the task: a nuclear reaction of the form (2.1) was investigated with initially specified parameters in the form of the kinetic energy of the directed beam and the mass of all participating particles in the nuclear reaction in a. e. m.;
2. During the Rutherford scattering analysis, strictly defined results were achieved in the form of the value of the nuclear effective cross section and the maximum distance convergence at critical velocity with the nucleus and the incoming particle;
3. Directed beams consume a certain amount of energy to overcome the Coulomb barrier, having residual energy — it’s found value is indicated.;
4. A list of the outgoing particles from the main channel of the nuclear reaction is made, including various groups of gamma rays, if any, indicating the kinetic energy (where, if necessary, their classification by energy is also compiled), the charge and current of each of them.;
5. If the formed particles can probabilistically interact (similar to the annihilation of positrons and electrons), then this is indicated and an additional list with all relevant accounts is provided.;
6. In accordance with each reaction, a list is provided with all the work performed in Joules and capacities in Watts for each type of radiation with all the components, along with the number of nuclei formed, their masses, other additional results and energy values;
7. The general conclusions on the objectives of this study are indicated — the general study / generation of electrical energy / establishment of conclusions on some precise aspect, etc., as well as conclusions in the relevant area: the amount of energy generated, conclusions on the necessary aspect, general scientific data, conclusions, etc.
Thus, based on mathematical analysis, the energies of the formed particles and their nature of origin are calculated. Nuclear reactions with bombarding charged particles with high and low kinetic energies of target nuclei, as well as the resonance state of these nuclear reactions, have been studied. The present method and algorithm is currently new with the results coming out.
Conclusion
Based on the theoretical calculations carried out, it is indicated that using the proposed analysis methods it is possible to obtain certain results that correlate with experimental data with a small error. At the same time, the use of the obtained model makes it possible to simulate the implementation of various types of nuclear reactions with bringing to a state of resonance. At the same time, the best variations can be selected among them, preserving their best efficiency, while maintaining maximum currents and energies of the outgoing beams, capable of further use through MHD generation. Thus, the proposed technique is a new approach to studying the nuclear interactions of high-energy particles with stationary target nuclei, considering the full-fledged effectiveness of each of the nuclear reaction channels, their own resultant parameters for each of the reaction products, and other data.
References
1. Aliev I. X., Sharofutdinov F. M. The use of accelerators and phenomena of collision of elementary particles with high-order energy to generate electrical energy. The «Electron» project. Electronic Laboratory LLC. The scientific school «Electron». Publishing solutions. The Ridero. 2021. — 594 p.
2. Aliev I. X. New parameters for nuclear reactions to be carried out at an LCU-EPD-300 type charged particle accelerator. The «Electron» project. Electronic Laboratory LLC. The scientific school «Electron». Publishing solutions. The Ridero. 2022. — 598 p.
3. Aliev I. X. Collision energy of oncoming beams. A young scientist. International Scientific Journal. Part No. 16 (306) /2020. ISSN 2071—0297. Publishing house «Young Scientist». 2020. 7—10 p.
4. Aliev I. X. Linear electron accelerator in power engineering. Exact science. Issue No. 85. The publishing house «Pluto». ISSN 2500—1132. 2020. 23—29 p.
5. Aliev I. X. Electron and its features. Exact science. Issue No. 63. The publishing house «Pluto». 2019. 37—39 p.
6. Aliev I. X. On a heuristic idea about the emergence of a new energy technology for obtaining energy from resonant nuclear reactions. International scientific journal «All Sciences». SRI «PRNR». Scientific school «Electron», Electron Laboratory LLC. Ridero. No. 1, 2022. 13—18 p.
7. Aliev I. X. Aluminum resonant nuclear reaction. International scientific journal «All Sciences». SRI «PRNR». Scientific school «Electron», Electron Laboratory LLC. Ridero. No. 3, 2022. 24—44 p.
8. Aliev I. X. On the types of charged particle injection systems in accelerator technology. International scientific journal «All Sciences». SRI «PRNR». Scientific school «Electron», Electron Laboratory LLC. Ridero. No. 4, 2022. 14—25 p.
9. Aliev I. X., Karimov B. X. Development of vacuum technologies in accelerator technology. International scientific journal «All Sciences». SRI «PRNR». Scientific school «Electron», Electron Laboratory LLC. Ridero. No. 4, 2022. 41—55 p.
10. Aliev I. X., Jalolov B. R., Karimov B. H. The role of resonant nuclear reactions in modern energy. The role of resonant nuclear reactions in modern energy. International scientific journal «All Sciences». SRI «PRNR». Scientific school «Electron», Electron Laboratory LLC. Ridero. No. 6, 2022. 50—113 pp.
11. Aliev I. X., Sharofutdinov F. M. On modern achievements in physics of resonant accelerator installations. International scientific journal «All Sciences». SRI «PRNR». Scientific school «Electron», Electron Laboratory LLC. Ridero. No. 8, 2022. 15—21 pp.
12. Aliev I. X., Karimov B. X. Physics of charged particle accelerators. The training manual. SRI «PRNR». Scientific school «Electron», Electron Laboratory LLC. Ridero. — 203 p.
13. L. Coragio, G. De Gregorio, T. Fukui, A. Gargano, Y.Z. Ma, Z.H. Cheng, F.R. Xu. The role of three-nucleon potentials in the shell model: past and present. Progress in particle physics and nuclear physics. Volume 134, January 2024, 104079.
14. Agnieszka Sorensen, Krziti Agarwal, Kyle W. Brown, Zbigniew Chaecki and others. The equation of state of dense nuclear matter after collisions of heavy ions. Progress in particle physics and nuclear physics. Volume 134, January 2024, 104080.
15. Stefan Diehl. Experimental study of the three-dimensional structure of nucleons. Progress in particle physics and nuclear physics. Volume 133, November 2023, 104069.
16. Gert Arts, Jorg Eichelin, Chris Allton, Andreas Athenodorou and others. Phase transitions in elementary particle physics: results and prospects of quantum chromodynamics of the crystal lattice.
17. M. Pfutzner, I. Mucha, S.M. Wang. Two-proton emission and related phenomena. Progress in particle physics and nuclear physics. Volume 132, September 2023, 104050.
18. Christian Graff, Lennart Volz, Marco Durante. New technologies for cancer treatment using accelerated particles.
19. Shanshan Cao1 and Guang-Yu Qin. The reaction of the medium and the correlation of the jet and hadron in the collision of relativistic heavy ions. Annual review of the science of the nucleus and elementary particles. Volume 73: 205—229 (volume publication date — September 2023) was first published as a preliminary review on July 17, 2023.
20. Lena V. Gast, Tanya Platt, Armin M. Nagel, Teresa Gerhalter. The latest technical developments and clinical studies of the use of MRI with sodium (23Na). Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Volumes 138—139, November–December 2023, Pages 1—51.
21. Claudio Dahlwit, Isabelle Gmur, Philip Ressler, Alvar D. Gossert. Determination of the affinity of strong ligands using NMR spectroscopy: limitations and ways to overcome them. Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Volumes 138—139, November–December 2023, pages 52—69.
22. Sandeep Kumar Mishra, N. Suryaprakash. Pure shift has edited the NMR methodology to isolate homo- and heteronuclear compounds with ultra-high resolution. Progress in nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Volumes 136—137, August–October 2023, Pages 1—60.